Search Warrants Use of Force Exigent Circumstances & Community Caretaking Search & Seizure Interview & Interrogation
100
Post Hoc Ping Warrant
This type of Search Warrant is also known as an "after the fact" Search Warrant. This Search Warrant is served to a service provider after obtaining location info on an emergency basis.
100
AB392
This Assembly Bill changed the vast majority of legislation listed in 835a PC.
100
Post Hoc Ping Warrant
Exigency must be present when obtaining this type of Warrant
100
4th Amendment
Protection from Unlawful Search & Seizure is outlined in this Constitutional Amendment.
100
Custody and Interrogation
In order for Miranda to apply, these two factors must be present.
200
72 hours
A Post Hoc Ping Warrant must be served to the Service provider within this amount of time.
200
Tennessee v. Garner
This landmark case created legislation surrounding the application of deadly force.
200
Exigent Circumstances
The Balancing Test for this is whether the need for the response outweighs the intrusiveness
200
Terry v. Ohio
This case established legislation for pat searches, which is categorized as a search under the 4th Amendment.
200
Admissible
"Maybe I should have a lawyer." If you continue questioning someone under Miranda after they provide this statement, info you obtain after this statement will be admissible/inadmissible in court.
300
1. Obtain signature from Supervisor
2. Send to DDA for approval
3. Send to Judge at EPO email for approval
4. Execute Search Warrant
5. Retain forensic imaging & book into evidence
6. Summarize findings
7. Serve owner with copy of SW/Notice of SW/Electronic Notice of SW
9. Search Warrant Return
Identify the entire Search Warrant process for a cell phone search warrant from start to finish.
300
Duty to intercede.
The expectation that a Police Officer will interfere with another Officer who is exercising excessive force is called...
300
Community Caretaking Doctrine
1. The need for the search must outweigh its intrusiveness.
2. The Officer's primary motivation must be to resolve the pressing issue.
3. The Officer's must doo only those things that were reasonably necessary.

These are the elements for....
300
False
True or False - Collecting fingernail scrapings is considered an intrusive search and a Search Warrant should be obtained prior to conducting this search.
300
Beheler
"You are not under arrest, you are free to leave at any time." This is part of what advisement?
400
1. Signature/Evidence Type
2. Orders/Judges Signature
3. Attachment A - Location(s) to be Searched
4. Attachment B - Items to be Seized/Searched,
5. Attachment C- PC
Identify the basic anatomy of a Search Warrant
400
1. Judged through perspective of reasonable officer with same or similar training and experience
2. Totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time force was used
3. Facts known to officer without regard for underlying intent/motive
4. Knowledge that officer acted properly under established law at the time.
The Objectively Reasonable Officer Standard elements include...
400
Exigent Circumstances
One of these is an exception for entering a residence without a warrant, the other is not. Which of these allows Police to enter a residence without a warrant?
(Exigent Circumstances or Community Caretaking Doctrine)
400
Coroner or Deputy Coroner
A 10-55's person can be searched with authorization from this member of Law Enforcement.
400
Unequivocal & Unambiguous?
In order for someone to "successfully" invoke their right to silence or counsel, one's invocation must be these two things
500
What is upload the documents to the DOJ portal.
If you are unable to serve a subject with the Search Warrant & Notice of Search Warrant, you are required to do this with the Search Warrant & Notice of Search Warrant
500
Graham v. Connor
*Severity of the crime
*Immediacy of the threat
*Actively resisting arrest
*Evading arrest

These are some factors established in this landmark Use of Force case.
500
People v. Ray
This landmark case originally established that the Community Caretaking Doctrine was an exception to the warrant requirement for entering a residence in 1996. This case was contradicted by People v. Ovieda in 2019.
500
Unlawful arrest and unlawful Search & Seizure
Senate Bill 16 would authorize the release of records of Police Officers pertaining to....
500
17 years or younger
Pursuant to Senate Bill 203, you cannot conduct a custodial interrogation with a minor age ______ without the minor consulting with legal counsel.






Case Law Update Jeopardy

Press F11 for full screen mode



Limited time offer: Membership 25% off


Clone | Edit | Download / Play Offline