Case Facts Went Balls Deep Into Notice Federal Rules, U.S.C., NY CPLR Minor Cases Softballs
200
International Shoe v. Washington
The case where a large company, incorporated in Delaware, with its primary business happening in Missouri, was compelled to pay Washington unemployment taxes
200
Constitutional
Due Process sets the __________ standards for notice
200
Rule 4
Service of Process (general)
500
Goodyear
The case that decided that you can exercise personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations if their contacts are so continuous and systematic as to essentially render them "at home"?
200
Fifth and Fourteenth
The amendments the Due Process Clause are found in
400
Pennoyer v. Neff
The case where a lawyer in Oregon wanted his legal fees from someone in California that were due for his help to acquire land
400
Federal Courts
The courts where Rule 4 governs service of process
400
28 U.S.C. §1332
Diversity of citizenship (of individuals and corporations) and amount in controversy (general)
500
Hanson
The case about a family inheritance that decided that a will merely being probated in Florida was not sufficient for personal jurisdiction?
400
When the cause of action does not arise in the forum and the contacts are less than continuous/systematic/intense/pervasive
When you can NEVER exercise jurisdiction
600
Daimler v. Bauman
The case that originated with the Argentinian human rights abuses that happened during the Dirty War (Guerra Sucia)
600
In-person > Certified Mail > General Mail > Publication
The hierarchy of traditional methods of service of process
600
Rule 8(a)(1)
Presumption Against Federal Jurisdiction (specific)
500
Kulko v. Superior Court of California
The case where the court ruled that California can't assert jurisdiction over someone who had not purposefully availed himself to their laws?
600
Judge Learned Hand
A former SDNY justice whose name is an incredibly intelligent body part
800
Burger King v. Rudzewicz
The case where a Michigan resident refused to pay a Florida corporation
Suitable Age & Discretion
The decision in Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. told us that notice needs to be left with someone of _______ ____ & ______.
800
Rule 21
Grants District Court the authority to dismiss non-diverse parties from suits so long as they are not indispensable
500
Hess v. Pawloski
The case where destruction of property in a car accident was viewed as being implied consent to jurisdiction?
800
13
The number of employees who lived in Washington in International Shoe?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v. Superior Court of CA
The case with the Plavix, a prescription drug which thins blood and reduces clotting
Burnham v. Superior Court
The case about transient ('tag') jurisdiction where the dad got served while bringing his child back from San Fransisco
NY C.P.L.R. §301
A Court may exercise such jurisdiction over persons, property, or status as might have been exercised heretofore
500
Feathers v. McLucas
The case where the makers of a defective gas truck design were found to have committed a tortious act (not a tort) in California, despite the truck explosion taking place in NY
Asahi Metal Industry Co v. Superior Court of CA,
J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro,
Schaeffer v. Heitner
There are more
Name 2 cases with important concurrences/split decisions/dissents






Civil Procedure Jeopardy

Press F11 for full screen mode



Limited time offer: Membership 25% off


Clone | Edit | Download / Play Offline