The culpable states of mind for MPC intent.

Intent to kill with premeditation and deliberation OR enumerated felony murder.

Justification of a crime when there is an imminent threat of unlawful force which causes D to reasonably believe he is in peril, and D uses force that is necessary & proportional.

This term refers to an accomplice in a crime who aids before the commission but is not present at commission.

Under these rules, the various tests for determining whether an attempt has occurred are mainly "wait and see" tests.

A killing committed purposely or knowingly.

Intent to kill without premeditation and deliberation; intent to cause great bodily harm or extreme recklessness; non-enumerated felony murder.

The involuntary form of this defense can always be used under CL and MPC, but use of the voluntary form is more limited.

This crime occurs when a person invites, requests, commands, hires, or encourages another to commit a crime.

Under these rules, a D is guilty of a crime only if the harm was a foreseeable risk of his conduct (proximate cause), even if D does not anticipate manner in which it occurs, although intervening act will shield from liability if coincidental and unforeseeable.

Homicide committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance.

Intent to kill while in a heat of passion upon adequate provocation.

Deadly force allowed under this defense if the person reasonably believes intruder intends to unlawfully and imminently enter to commit a forcible and atrocious felony, and deadly force is necessary to prevent entry.

An agreement to commit a criminal act.

A common limitation to defenses under these rules is that D must not have been reckless or negligent in forming her belief that defense is necessary.

Homicide committed with gross recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.

A killing that occurs due to reckless or grossly negligent behavior.

This justification is allowed when D believes her conduct is necessary to avoid an evil/harm, which would have been greater than the harm caused by D's conduct, IF there is no legislation precluding defense.

This defense is allowed under CL for subsequent criminal acts if D communicated his renunciation and neutralized his assistance, and under MPC if D terminated complicity prior to commission AND neutralized assistance, timely warned, or thwarted.

Under these rules, knowledge is enough to be guilty of conspiracy if D has intent to further the criminal enterprise or the crime is of an aggravated nature.

Homicide committed while consciously taking an unjustified risk.

The limitations for felony murder (3).

D is relieved of responsibility when as a result of mental disease/defect, she lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of her conduct or lacked substantial capacity to conform her conduct to the requirement of the law.

Under the CL, an individual can be liable for unplanned crimes committed by their partner based on this doctrine.

Under these rules, duress can be used as a defense to murder.