| R V BOUDREAULT | Personal Views & Understanding of the Issues |
|---|---|
|
What were the readings for the breathalyzer test?
The readings were 250 mg and 242 mg
per 100 ml of blood. |
Do you agree with the final Judgement that the Judge has decided; and if so; please your support your answers.
- Had an Alternative Plan
- Did not drive the vehicle when was intoxicated |
|
What three essential elements are listed below and under what Section to they fall under.
“1) an intentional course of conduct associated with a motor vehicle; 2) by a person whose ability to drive is impaired, or whose blood alcohol level exceeds the legal limit; 3) in circumstances that create a realistic risk of danger to persons or property.”
The three essential elements of care and control
under section 253(1) of the Criminal Code: |
The taxi driver arrived about 45 minutes after the first call and saw Boudreault sleeping in the driver's seat. Instead of waking him, the cabbie called police? If you were in his shoes, would you have done the same?
All Views Are Accurate
|
|
NEED A QUESTION
NEED AN ANSWER
|
In this case, the Crown only alleged that Boudreault would, at some point, intentionally set his vehicle in motion, thereby causing a risk of danger? What are your thoughts regarding this assumption?
All Views Are Accurate
|
|
True Or False: Boudreault was charged with having care and control of a motor vehicle while his ability to drive was impaired by alcohol and with
having care and control of a motor vehicle with more than 80 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood.
TRUE
|
Can you think of two evidence as Crown
used to prove there was realistic risk of danger?
First, an person who initially does not intend to drive may later, while still impaired, change his or her mind and proceed to do so; second, an inebriated person behind the wheel may unintentionally set the vehicle in motion; and third, through negligence, bad judgment or otherwise, a stationary or inoperable vehicle may endanger persons or property.
|
Support Us on Ko-fi